• Home
  • Music
  • History & Spaces
  • Composers
  • Selected works
    • All the transcriptions
    • Online player
  • Contact
  • Ελληνικά

COMPOSERS

A defining characteristic of the cultures that flourished within the great empires was their pluralism. In Ottoman urban music in particular— which, as we have seen, bridged the secular with the sacred, the city with the countryside, the “high” with the “popular”—contributors from the 17th century onwards included not only Muslims but also members of the non-Muslim ethno-religious communities of the Ottoman empire, such as the Rum (“Romioi”, Orthodox Christian Ottoman subjects), Armenians, and Jews. Of course, intercommunal relations were not always harmonious, as they were built upon an institutionally established primacy of Muslims. Especially from the 19th century onwards, with the rise of nationalism, these ethno-religious communities increasingly came to define themselves as distinct national entities, fostering competing modernities. Nonetheless, Ottoman urban music remained a space of collaboration, cultural osmosis, and exchange—though this does not mean that rivalries and tensions did not find their way into the musical sphere as well.

Eminent musicians, particularly those employed at the Palace, often possessed a broad musical education and erudition that enabled them to navigate diverse musical environments. It was not uncommon for them to have a deep knowledge of their own community’s liturgical tradition—whether Jewish, Christian, or Muslim—alongside the central musical repertoire of the court, as well as other popular rural or urban genres, such as the Phanariot songs and even Western musical styles. This model of “multi-musicality” granted them access to these varied spheres, which they interconnected through their musical pathways, acting as cultural intermediaries.

The presence of Rum and, more broadly, non-Muslim musicians at the imperial court became firmly established in the second half of the 17th century. Initially, they distinguished themselves as instrumentalists and composers in instrumental forms, and later, from the 18th century onward, in vocal forms as well. The Rum composers presented here were active in different historical periods, and it is important to remember that their work and musical trajectories were shaped by the era in which they lived and by the career paths available to them. Furthermore, despite being members of the Rum community, they did not belong to a homogeneous group. Some were actively involved in the circles of the Patriarchate, chanting in the city’s churches and excelling as theorists, composers, or teachers of ecclesiastical music. Others belonged to the upper strata, such as the Greek-speaking elites who participated in Ottoman administration or the higher clergy, as well as affluent merchants and scholars. However, the vast majority were musicians of humble, popular backgrounds who primarily composed and performed secular music. While they all identified as Rum, their ethnic, linguistic, and social identities could vary significantly.

It is also important to remember that beyond the well-documented musicians and composers—whether Rum or others—who have been recorded by history, there exists a vast number of lesser-known or anonymous musicians. They were active in the various music venues or within the Palace itself, leaving their sonic imprint in churches, synagogues, and tekkes throughout the city, though not in the written sources. This realization has led modern historians to reconsider the person-centered approach through which the history of Ottoman music has traditionally been written.

Musical

Portraits

The biographical details and dates provided for the featured Rum composers are given with caution. They reflect a reality in which sources sometimes agree, sometimes disagree, and at times remain silent. For example, birth and death dates, when mentioned, may differ from one source to another. It is often difficult to match names found in different records or identify them with historical figures. Discrepancies between Greek and Turkish sources are common, and the same historical figure may be presented with differing aspects of their life and musical identity. Determining the accuracy of one version over another would require extensive historical research, with no guarantee of a definitive outcome. Thus, our goal is to reconstruct, even if only partially, aspects of the musical lives of some prominent Rum composers—those whose existence is attested in historical sources. We aim to present a picture of their encounters and interactions with fellow musicians, theorists, and composers, as well as their movements within the city—whether leading to the Palace, the church and other sacred spaces, or the taverns and entertainment venues.

By selecting the arrows and the corresponding dates, you can navigate through the timeline and the musical portraits of the composers.

  1. 1615
  2. 1673
  3. 1680
  4. 1740
  5. 1845
  6. 1900
  7. 1915
  8. 1925
  1. Tanburi Angeli

    c. 1615-1680/90
    Angelis (Angeli, Tanburi Angeli) was a composer and tanbur player who worked as a musician at the Ottoman Palace during the reign of Sultan Mehmed IV (1648–1687). His name appears in imperial records documenting the payroll of instrumental and vocal music instructors. Like Dimitrie Kantemir, whom he taught music for fifteen years, Angelis is considered a pioneering composer in the development of the new instrumental form peşrev. His compositions were distinguished by their slow rhythmic tempo and intricate melodic development. Kantemir mentions him in his book on music and includes four of his compositions.
  2. Dimitrie Kantemir/ Kantemiroğlu

    1673-1723
    Dimitrie Kantemir was a Moldavian prince, son of Moldavian ruler Constantin Kantemir, and a polymath—scholar, historian, and philosopher. As part of his education in Moldavia, he received a classical Greek education under the Cretan monk Ieremias Kakavelas. During his years in Istanbul (1693–1710), he continued his studies at the Great School of the Nation at Fener while also immersing himself in Islamic theology, Ottoman-Turkish, and Arabic. Simultaneously, he devoted himself to studying the musical traditions of the Ottoman court, learning from two distinguished Rum musicians for fifteen years: the former Christian convert Kemanî Ahmed Çelebi (d. 1720) and Angelis (Tanburi Angeli). Kantemir became a master of the tanbur and distinguished himself as a composer. His most significant musical legacy is the Kitabu İlmu’l Musiki Ala Vechi’l-Hurufat (The Book of the Science of Music through Alphabetical Notation), a groundbreaking theoretical treatise on Ottoman music. The work includes an extensive collection of compositions transcribed in an innovative alphabetical notation system that Kantemir himself devised.
  3. Zaharya

    c. 1680-1740/50
    Zaharya was a musician with both ecclesiastical and secular compositions, referenced in both Greek and Ottoman-Turkish sources. Although he composed church music, he is primarily remembered as a composer of secular music. Ottoman sources recognize him as the most significant non-Muslim composer of Ottoman music. Zacharias was a fur trader (kürkçü) from a wealthy background and was active during the reigns of Ahmed III (1703–1730) and Mahmud I (1730–1754), particularly during the Tulip Era (Lâle Devri, 1718–1730)—a period of flourishing arts and music. He was likely a hanende (vocalist) in the Ottoman Palace, and some sources suggest he also played the tanbur. His vocal and instrumental compositions are known for their sophistication, intricacy, and grandeur, and they remain central to the classical Turkish music repertoire. His rich body of work survives only in part, preserved through oral tradition, handwritten manuscripts in Byzantine and Hampartsum notation, and 19th-century printed collections. The claim that he converted to Islam in his later years, as well as the suggestion that he served as a church cantor, remain unverified due to lack of conclusive evidence.
  4. Petraki

    c. 1730/35-1778
    Petros Peloponnesios, also known as Petros Lampadarios, was a leading figure in Byzantine chant. Born in the Peloponnese, he studied in Smyrna under Hieromonk Theodosios Chios before moving to Istanbul in the 1750s, where he became a student of the Patriarchal Protopsaltis Ioannis Trapezountios. He served as Domestikos and later as Lampadarios at the Ecumenical Patriarchate. As a composer of ecclesiastical music, he revitalized Byzantine chant with new compositions that replaced older melodies and developed his own system of analytical notation for both liturgical and secular music. In the realm of "external" music (secular or extra-ecclesiastical), Petros was a pioneer of Phanariot songs, considered one of the first composers of the genre. In Ottoman urban music, he is likely identified as Petraki or Tyriaki. He was skilled in playing the ney and tanbur and was also a vocalist. His connections with the Mevlevi dervishes and possibly the Bektashis are evident in contemporary sources. His remarkable ability to transcribe oral traditions earned him admiration in Ottoman musical circles, leading to the nickname "thief" (hırsız Petraki). As a transcriber, Petros compiled collections of secular songs in Byzantine notation, preserving a significant portion of the Ottoman urban music repertoire of his time.
  5. Kemençeci Vasil

    1845-1907
    A Rum from Silivri, possibly of Roma descent, Vasilakis is regarded as the greatest kemençe (lyra) virtuoso after Tanburi Cemil Bey. His first steps in music were on the clarinet, performing at festivals and celebrations accompanied by percussion. He later learned the lyra from a musician named Giorgis from Phanar (Fener). By 1870, he had settled in Istanbul. In the cafés of Galata, he met Antonis (see Antonis Kyriazidis / Lavtacı Andon) and joined his ensemble as a second lyra player, alongside Nikolakis (see Nikolakis / Nikolaki Efendi). Yiannis Kyriazidis used to say that Vasilakis mastered in two years what had taken him twenty to learn. His growing reputation made him highly sought after among the court circles and music-loving officials. Vasilakis also played a key role in elevating the lyra from an instrument of the kabasaz popular music orchestras to a recognized instrument within Ottoman urban music ensembles. His most famous student, the composer and musician Tanburi Cemil Bey, brought further technical mastery and refinement to the instrument. Though Vasilakis composed only a few pieces, they are highly regarded, and he was also a maker of lyras. Among his students was Anastasios Leontaridis, father of Paraschos and Lambros Leontaridis, both of whom worked as musicians in music cafés, taverns, and later in radio broadcasting.
  6. Udi Yorgo

    1900-1977
    Giorgos Batzanos was born in Istanbul into a family of distinguished musicians, possibly of Romani descent. His father, Haralambos (Lambo Efendi), was a laouto player, while his brother Alekos (Aleko) and his uncle Anastasios Leontaridis (Anastas) were both renowned kemençe (lyra) players. From an early age, Giorgos displayed remarkable musical talent, beginning with an ud crafted by his father when he was just five years old. Despite his father’s encouragement to complete his formal education, Giorgos devoted himself entirely to music. He studied under his father and later trained with Udi Kirkor and Karnik Garmiryan. At the age of twelve, he made his debut at a nightclub. Later, he performed in Cyprus and Egypt and also worked for Turkish radio. Though a gifted pianist and songwriter, Batzanos is remembered above all for his mastery of the oud.
  7. Kemençeci Nikolaki

    mid-19th century - c. 1915
    Kemençeci Nikolaki was born and died in Istanbul. For years, he collaborated with Yiannis and Antonis Kyriazis (see Antonis Kyriazidis / Lavtacı Andon), performing with their ensemble at Antonis' venue in Galata. Sources describe him as an exceptional kemençe (lyra) player. Though his teacher remains unknown, he was renowned for his skill in the köçekçe repertoire and oyun havaları, performing in kabasaz ensembles (lyra, laouto, percussion). His compositions were mainly instrumental, including peşrev and semai, but he also wrote pieces in the şarkı vocal form.
  8. Lavtacı Andon

    mid-19th century - c. 1925
    Antonis Kyriazidis, or Kyriazis, played the lute (laouto in Greek, lavta in Turkish) and the ud. Along with his brothers Christos (or Christakis, d. circa 1914) and Yiannis (or Jivanis, "The Blind One," Turkish: Civan, d. circa 1910), who were also laouto players and composers, particularly of vocal repertoire, they gained distinction as musicians in the city's music cafés and taverns, in districts such as Pera and Galata. They operated at the crossroads between Ottoman urban music and the kabasaz popular music orchestras—ensembles of laouto, lyra, and percussion, which accompanied the dance performances of köçekçeler (singular: köçekçe), young boys dressed in women's clothing. Antonis' compositions in the peșrev and semai instrumental forms remain beloved to this day, and several pieces from the köçekçe dance repertoire are also attributed to him. According to some sources, Antonis and his brothers maintained ties with the Palace, where they were frequently invited to perform. They were also closely associated with some of the great musicians of their era, such as Tanburi Cemil Bey (1873–1916), Vasilakis (Kemençeci Vasil), and the Armenian Tatyos Efendi (1858–1913)—the latter two, in fact, were said to have been students of Yiannis, or Civan.
Sources

Facebook-f Youtube Instagram

The project “Synavgeia: Romioi Composers of Constantinople” was implemented in 2024 with the endorsement and financial support of the Ministry of Culture.

Πολιτική Απορρήτου     Όροι Χρήσης     Πηγές     Συντελεστές     Επικοινωνία

© 2024 Labyrinth Musical Workshop